Dr. Ashton Bradley
These lectures present an introduction to three related topics:
DifferentialEquations.jl
Mathematical formalism of SDE's.
References
We are all familiar with solving ODE's and PDE's to understand physical problems. A lot of our progress in understanding observations of nature can be traced to this process.
$^{87}$Rb BEC forming at Otago (Kjaergaard Light and Matter Lab)
Gross Pitaevskii equation
where $g=4\pi\hbar^2 a/m$ is the s-wave interaction strength.
Let's take a 1D example, harmonically trapped.
giving
So, where are the fluctuations??
The description of any system coupled to an environment will lead naturally to a stochastic differential equation containing both damping and noise terms.
The system-environment coupling introduces irreversible processes inherent in statistical mechanics.
Even at absolute zero temperature, quantum vacuum fluctuations often play the role of an environment. Another obvioius manifestation of environmental quantum noise is the spontaneous emission of a two-level atom.
Physical motivation and mathematical formalism of SDE's. This lecture will borrow heavily from ___the Gardiner book:___
Suppose your house is on fire, and you only have time to rescue a single item from the blazing inferno. What item would you choose to save? A Dutch mathematics professor—happily married, with children—instantly replied: ‘‘I would rescue the Gardiner book!’’. This anecdote illustrates at least two points. The first point is that the book by Crispin Gardiner (2004), ‘‘Handbook of Stochastic Methods’’ is a classic text on stochastic differential equations (SDEs). The second point is that the mathematics professor was probably unaware that the out-of-print 1985 edition has been followed up by a 1997 edition, and, most recently, a 2004 edition.
Brownian motion was first identified in 1827 by Robert Brown
The success of Einstein's explanation was interpreted as giving direct microscopic evidence for the existence of ___atoms___.
By Lookang Author of computer model: Francisco Esquembre, Fu-Kwun and lookang - Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link
Given a collection of $n$ Brownian particles immersed in a thermally activated fluid, described by distribution $P(x,t)$ such that
$$\int_{-\infty}^\infty dx\; P(x,t)=n,$$Einstein showed that under particular assumptions of regularity, the equation of motion for the ___Brownian particle distribution___ can be approximated as
where $D$ is called the diffusion coefficient; the value of $D$ depends upon the microscopic physical processes giving rise to random forces. In general, FPE has form
$$\frac{\partial P(x,t)}{\partial t}=\underbrace{-\frac{\partial }{\partial x}(A(x,t)P(x,t))}_{\textrm{Drift}} + \underbrace{\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial x^2}(D(x,t)P(x,t))}_{\textrm{Diffusion}}.$$In multivariable systems, $A$ becomes a drift ___vector___ and $D$ a diffusion ___matrix___.
If we introduce a concentrated droplet of dye into the fluid, modelled as the localized initial condition
$$P(x,0)=n\delta(x),$$the exact solution is (Fourier transfrom the FPE)
describing a spreading distribution caused by the random jostling, with spatial variance
$$\langle x^2\rangle=\int dx\;P(x,t)x^2 = 2Dt.$$The rms spatial extent of the droplet $\lambda_x=\sqrt{\langle x^2\rangle}\sim \sqrt{t}$ exhibits the characteristic diffusive scaling with time.
A complimentary approach to Einstein's, with more direct microscipic construction of the dynamics:
"... infiniment plus simple" than Einstein's treatment. [Langevin]
Our aim in these lectures is to show how one can combine the two approaches in the context of quantum mechanics to develop a tractable approach for solving many body quantum dynamics; the approach is also well suited to revealing semi-classical approximations and analytical insights.
The particle velocity $u(t)$ is assumed to be governed by a naive form of stochastic differential equation
where
$\gamma$ is the friction coefficient of the system, which is related to $D$ (we will see how).
For a sphere of radius $a$, mass $m$, in fluid of viscousity $\eta$
namely, that on average the force vanishes, and that the forces at different times are statistically independent. At this point the force strength $f$ is ___unknown___; it turns out to be closely related to $\gamma$, and we will see how to deduce it later (if you find the pathology at $t\to t'$ physically troubling, you are not alone!).
We can find the formal solution of the Langevin equation as
Before proceeding we emphasize that later we will introduce a rigorous formulation of the SDE that will calrify the nature of the force, and leads to the notion of ___Ito calculus___. For now, we simply use the statistical properties of the noise, and see what can be deduced.
The mean velocity is simply $\langle u(t)\rangle = u(0)e^{-\gamma t},$
and the viscosity damps away the initial flow.
The variance $\langle [u(t)- u(0)e^{-\gamma t}]^2\rangle = [1-e^{-2\gamma t}]f/2\gamma$ (show this!) gives us the result
$$\langle u(t)^2\rangle = u(0)^2e^{-2\gamma t}+\frac{f}{2\gamma}[1-e^{-2\gamma t}]$$The physically crucial observation is that the steady state should satisfy the equipartition theorem. For times $t\gg 1/\gamma$, we impose the steady-state constraint
$$\langle u(t)^2\rangle_s\longrightarrow\frac{f}{2\gamma}=\frac{k_BT}{2}$$and hence
This is an example of the ___fluctuation-dissipation theorem:___
We can find the spreading of the Langevin paths in space from $x(t)=\int_0^t u(t')dt'$.
a. Show that $\langle x(t)\rangle = \frac{u(0)}{\gamma}(1-e^{-\gamma t})$.
b. Using $\alpha(s)\equiv\sqrt{f}\int_0^s dt\; e^{-\gamma(s-t)}\xi(t)$, show that $g(s,s')\equiv\langle \alpha(s)\alpha(s')\rangle$ is
$$g(s,s')=\frac{f}{2\gamma}e^{-\gamma(s+s')}\left[e^{2\gamma\textrm{min}(s,s')}-1\right]=\frac{f}{2\gamma}\left[e^{-\gamma|s-s'|}-e^{-\gamma(s+s')}\right]$$c. Hence show that
$$ \langle [x(t)-\langle x(t)\rangle]^2\rangle = \int_0^t ds\int_0^tds'g(s,s')=\frac{ft}{\gamma^2}-(1-e^{-\gamma t})\frac{2f}{\gamma^3}+(1-e^{-2\gamma t})\frac{f}{2\gamma^3}$$At short times the initial velocity dominates: $\langle x(t)^2\rangle\simeq (u(0)t)^2$; the long-time limit is of particular interest to connect with the FPE.
Recall, from Einstein's Brownian motion FPE, that
$$\langle x^2\rangle=\int dx\;P(x,t)x^2 = 2Dt.$$The long-time behavior of $\langle [x(t)-\langle x(t)\rangle]^2\rangle$ can be taken as the definition of the diffusion coefficient
Thus we have established an important link between the approaches of Langevin and Einstein.
The workhorse of stochastic differential equations, the Wiener process provides the fundamental source of noise.
An understanding of the Wiener process will allow us to define and work with stochastic integrals - also, rather confusingly, known as stochastic differential equations.
We might expect, given the $\delta$-correlation, that this object would fair better inside an integral. This is exactly the definition of the ___Wiener process___
where $\xi(t)$ is required to be Gaussian. We emphasize that the pathology returns as soon as we try to differentiate:
$$\frac{dW}{dt}=\xi(t)$$is not well defined - Wiener process is ___continuous everywhere___, but ___differentiable nowhere!___
Then we have the first moments
\begin{align} \langle W(t)\rangle&=\int_0^t\langle\xi(t')\rangle = 0,\\ \langle W(t)^2\rangle&=\int_0^t dt'\int_0^t dt'\langle\xi(t')\xi(t)\rangle = t, \end{align}and $W(t)$ is Gaussian, with mean zero variance $t$, with probability density
\begin{align} p(w,t|0,0)dw &\equiv \textrm{Prob.} \quad w<W(t)<w+dw\notag\\ &=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi t}}e^{-w^2/2t}dw \tag{Diffusion} \end{align}Note that this is precisely the solution of the localized droplet diffusion problem, for $D=1/2$. This is the fundamental Gaussian diffusion process from which all others are constructed.
In general, if $W(t_0)=w_0$, then $W(t)=w_0 + \int_{t_0}^t dt'\xi(t')$, with conditional probability distribution
Notice that $p(w,t|w_0,t_0)\to\delta(w-w_0)$ as $t\to t_0$. Hence, knowledge of $W(t_0)$ completely determines $p$ at all $t>t_0$.
Exercise: show that the diffusion solution satisfies
$$\frac{\partial p(w,t|0,0)}{\partial t}=\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial^2 p(w,t|0,0)}{\partial w^2}$$Exercise: prove that
$$ p(w,t|w_0,t_0)=\int dw_1 p(w,t|w_1,t_1)p(w_1,t_1|w_0,t_0)$$provided $t>t_1>t_0$. This is a more formal demonstration of the ___Markov property___.
Next time: